If you haven’t heard of twitter then you’ve either been living on another planet for the past few months, or you’re the kind of person that has a life.Unfortunately, I’m neither of the above.
Twitter describes itself as “a community of friends and strangers from around the world sending updates about moments in their lives”, but really the best description is a “micro-blogging” site.
You see, unlike a typical blog, twitter wants to know “What are you doing?” 24 hours a day. You have a text box with 140 characters, and the idea is that you give a running commentary of every moment of your life.All messages you send automatically appear on all your “friends’” pages, and all their messages appear on yours. Horrifying, isn’t it?
But it gets worse. The thing that makes twitter stand out is that all messages can be sent and received via your favourite instant messenger.. or on your mobile phone. So what you end up with is a service that’s half way between a blog and a “group instant messenger”.
So why is this so bad?
Well it’s partly down to the kind of people that are using the service. You see, twitter is very popular with the geek community on the West Coast, and has kind of spread out from there. So what you see on the site is a combination of techie messages, dot-com-geek-wannabes trying to get noticed and a whole load of stuff that’s so mundane it just makes you wonder why you didn’t spend the last ten minutes doing something constructive instead - like maybe shooting yourself in the head.
Call me old fashioned, but I really have no interest in the fact that Leo Laporte is eating his lunch, Cali Lewis is drinking a coffee with Splenda Flavor Blends, or even whose couch Kevin Rose happens to be trowing up on today.
You see, unless all your friends are on twitter the noise-to-signal ratio on the site is enough to make you want to go out and pull the legs of kittens to relieve the boredom.
And that’s why twitter will succeed.Because it only works if all your friends are on it, the only way to have any real fun is to invite them all. Then you can be the one inflicting the tedium on others! Yay!Now this ‘model’ has been used before - and what we ended up with was MySpace. The largest and most pointless thing ever created in the history of humanity. And now twitter is going the same way.
For the casual observer though, there’s something a little odd about twitter’s business model. You see, they don’t have any ads - and they let you send and receive updates via text message for free. So how dow they expect to make money, let alone stay in business?Simple. Once they reach a critical mass, they’ll start charging for sending text messages. Already, a lot of users are using their phones so they can “stay in touch” while out and about. Many of them are finding they can’t live without twitter on their phone. (Yes, they are sad, sad people.)
But imagine twitterers are sending a million messages a day between them (which is easily achievable) and only 5% of those are sent from a phone. Now imagine twitter makes 50 cents from each of those messages. That’s $25,000 a day or $9,125,000 a year in revenue without even trying, with very little required in the name of network resources and a site so basic it hurts just to think about it.
What I’d really like to see is a twitter competitor with more functionality and a clearer delineation between real friends and people think they’re cool and somehow get off on telling the whole world every time they go to the toilet. Unfortunately, it may already be too late…
(Oh, and my twitter username is domr - add me and feel my contempt.)
29 Responses
Chris Heuer
March 30th, 2007 at 6:42 am
1I hate posting a first comment on someone’s blog where I am disagreeing with them, but unfortunately, I must - on two points even.
The beauty of Twitter is that you never need to have Leo’s lunch on your message page, you only pay attention to people you really care about, who you add to your network. If they start posting drivel, you remove them and don’t watch what they are saying any more.
Further, your financial model is amiss completely. Who pays $0.50 per text message these days? At the moment, some people believe they are already making some money from carrier relationships, though as a private company, this is unconfirmed. If they are making money at all, it is more like .02-.04 per outbound message. Commercial SMS gateways charge companies anywhere from .04 to .12 per message sent. After giving away the SMS already (and forcing many people I know to upgrade their mobile accounts to unlimited SMS) I can’t imagine Twitter succesfully charging for this service ever - no one would pay and everyone would move to the next service.
Dom
March 30th, 2007 at 2:15 pm
2Chris: You’re more than welcome to disagree here. :)
I’m sure Twitter is much more fun if all your friends are there, but I’m reluctant to send my real friends an invite to yet another site - particularly one which I don’t really like.
Of course, if it really takes off, they’ll probably be there anyway - along with the entire MySpace crowd. And I do think Twitter will go down the MySpace route. A site that doesn’t really do a lot, but the kids love anyway.
As for the revenue, premium rate SMS is a huge business here in Europe and people already pay 50p a go for chat services. Some services (usually annoying TV votes & quizes) charge up to £1.50 ($3) per message and tens of thousands of people use them.
I could easily see Twitter charging 30p/60cents a message and getting away with it - but not until the site is big enough that it’s swamped all the competition. People (particularly kids) will use it - and pay for it - simply because all their friends are doing it.
Jay (living in First Life)
April 9th, 2007 at 5:45 am
3Twitter is dumb and demonstrates how Web 2.0 entrepreneurs are all seeking to create the BIGGEST, BESTEST, COOLEST, GEEKIEST, SWEETEST idea ever. No one seems to actually focus on solving real needs but creating services that allow us to be less connected from each other.
Twitter makes me no more connected to my friends. If I wanted to be connected to them, I’d text them individually.
Another, less serious reason that Twitter will fail is that women don’t use it. If your target market is 18 - 35 year olds, you have to get women to use it. If not, no reasonable male other than uber-geeks will use it.
The uber geeks will not be able to reproduce and will therefore be unable to pass on the genetic mutation that allowed them to find value in Twitter in the first place to anyone thereby leading to a slow and painful death for Twitter and the TWITs that use them.
For those of you with poor vocabulary skills and literary knowledge, you may want to explore a Roald Dahl book known as The Twits to really learn what I just called you.
Roy Rodgers
August 14th, 2007 at 4:30 am
4I was duped into getting twitter by Ed Dale & Co. Twitter is a fad and like all fads that serve no useful purpose it will be forgotten.
If it is not a fad, what is it? and if it isn’t a fad, there is still no reason why it should last longer than Hula Hoops.
OOPS, sorry, in Web 2.0 it is a marketing tool
commenter
August 21st, 2007 at 2:23 pm
5I have to agree that the 0.50 figure given for charges per text is ridiculous in pretty much any currency.
Uncle Drew
September 9th, 2007 at 12:55 pm
6Meaningless bits of information. There are much better ways to spend one’s time.
t-licious
September 17th, 2007 at 9:15 am
7Wow, I finally find some people who think like me. Thanks everyone.
Christian
January 15th, 2008 at 4:04 am
8I created the group Twitter Must Die on Facebook if you are interested. I made this video about it, to. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4FuOZQKRtE
Defmall
February 15th, 2008 at 11:08 pm
9Twitter is an incredible waste of time. All of my friends will NOT be on Twitter becasue ALL of my friends agree it’s pointless crap.
Not only is the CONCEPT stupid, but 140 characters is not enough space to write anything meaningful. Even if you are only following people you ‘want’ to follow, you won’t get much more information other than ’so-and-so is reading a book’ and ’so-and-so is eeating Sushi’. What crap!
Even from a marketing standpoint, it’s worthless. How the f–k and I going to convey MEANINGFUL information with my ‘followers’ in such restricted space?!
If you have enough free time to constantly jot down what you are doing, then you have TOO mcuh free time! Twitter Blows!
Aaron
February 23rd, 2008 at 11:47 pm
10Old thread; don’t care.
First of all, “Twitter” is a really, really lame name.
Web world says this will change humanity, not by it’s social function, but by its publishing function. I’m trying to make it useful but really, not one wants to sign up to it. It’s probably the lame name.
Oh, and the fact that you can only have one account, unless you use a different email. Even then, you can only use your phone number once. So there’s not useful way to organize what “tweets” (again, lame) you want to send and receive. Either everyone reads it, or no one does.
Megan aka BizDevMarketing
March 19th, 2008 at 12:07 am
11On 3/17 you’re the first SERP result for “twitter sucks.” Begs the question, “is this…ehem… intentional?” If not, I’m surprised (although delighted.) Why? Because twitter and every other shoot-me-in-the-head / antithesis-to-privacy website born in the last 5 years presents massive back alley opportunity for marketers. And as a result, web publishers are now *forced* to participate in them if they want to stay competitive, and wow…*that* sucks even more.
Some call it “engaging with an audience in a more meaningful way,” or “extending your reach” or … blech… I’ve used these myself, even. Really, though. Twitter and its sisters are like reality tv gone web, voyeurism gone tech. In concept anyway.
Not to say there aren’t some very real and functional uses here; it of course depends on the user. A lot of famous SEOs have talked about sharing and following activities online specifically related to search engine marketing activities. Although I’m eternally grateful, there’s no way I’d ever give away *my* farm… not to twitter, anyway.
OMG I’m ranting like a self important person. But wait, wait. Let me tie a bow on it like this:
The concept of a global communication inter-web, spun and woven by social platforms is… tantalizing, at least. It’s hopeful, and it’s positive implications to culture and economy could be profound. But gee-whiz, don’t sell out. My clients’ traffic stats *don’t* suck, and I’m one of the last people on the planet without a myspace page. So if you’re an SEO - don’t be fooled. Social media isn’t your ticket to success anymore than “american idol” is dibbs on a grammy.
Dom
March 19th, 2008 at 12:33 pm
12Megan: Re SERPS - Of course it was planned. :)
Megan
March 19th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
13LOL!!! Good Job ;)
Megan
March 19th, 2008 at 8:21 pm
14ps. i subscribed
Neil Yeomans
March 31st, 2008 at 11:21 am
15Nice article. What is interesting is how the Web marketing community has only seemed to jump on Twitter in the past few months, despite the fact that Twitter has been going strong for several years. Dave Naylor, Blogstorm, Aaron Wall, Shoemoney and Andrew Girdwood are a few recent people to jump on the bandwagon.
Services like LinkedIn for contact and tumblelogging for presenting useful snippets of information work better for me. I won’t be getting a Twitter account anytime soon ;)
Tin Pig
March 31st, 2008 at 4:01 pm
16I recently created a Twitter account myself and my immediate impression is that this hyper-connectivity the social sites are driving too has gone too far. As a person, an individual, I don’t really want all my friends to know what I’m doing every moment of every day - and I don’t expect the thinking ones to care very much. So what I’ve found is that I really don’t have anything to Twitter about. I believe the shine will wear off in the near future.
Jason
March 31st, 2008 at 4:52 pm
17Just reading about twitter makes me feel that I’m wasting my time. I will resist this service for as long as possible.
n1ce
April 1st, 2008 at 6:48 am
18What would make Twitter better (than useless)? That is the question that has to be answered if it isn’t going to be a “gone tomorrow” fad.
ideas:
- Auto update your location via personal GPS -to-SMS
- Connect your IP webcam and show your place of work or home live
- Live video of your eye’s view via video glasses
- Auto tracking your movement on the web… a trail of URLs
All assumes you don’t actually like privacy of course…
Chris von Nieda
April 2nd, 2008 at 7:35 am
19So far I don’t see any value…I have better things to do then “tweet” all day. But alass there is always someone who figures out a totally creative way to exploit this service to ones best interest!
Greg
April 4th, 2008 at 1:10 am
20Great post. Sensible and to the point. Twitter seems pointless, but it also appears to be something you don’t really appreciate until you get into it along with your clique (which hasn’t happened to me, and probably won’t).
funbytebitstop.wordpress.com
April 10th, 2008 at 12:44 am
21As I was writing a post on this exact topic, I decided to check the web to see if anyone shared my sentiment. I came across this page and thought, finally, someone understands. You may enjoy my post here:
http://funbytebitstop.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/attention-twitter-users-nobody-cares/
Paul
April 14th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
22I have to agree. I joined to find out what the fuss is all about, but find it nothing more than a distraction. I dont have time in my life to inform all of my “friends” about what is new. And as you say, SMS is all I need for small messages - logging in to either a website or IM to do the same doesn’t fly with me. The majority of them are acquantances online who *think* they know me. And that is definitely not useful in any shape or form. What it does give though is an opportunity for bloggers who aren’t in the mood for a full post to spout crap. *Shrug*. I’m sure for the dedicated users its great, but only because its an intrusive snapshot into someones life - something im not prepared to share.
dustyBin
April 16th, 2008 at 3:56 am
23Twitter is an excellent incomplete sentence training tool.
Sumit
April 17th, 2008 at 3:03 pm
24Twitter probably won’t start charging. Typically services that offer something for free and then charge for it go under very quickly. That and the people who made Twitter have a lot of other money making ventures. I think Twitter is more of a pet to them.
In some ways Twitter has the potential to be less cluttered than My-Book or Face-Space or Crap-Whatever. I really only want to get texts from friends who I care about, and it’s not always “I’m at such and such bar” but it can be random crap like “John McCain is a Cylon” … random funny stuff you normally text to two or three people can now be done with one message, and the people who really hate those funny messages can just refuse them on their devices without anyone’s feelings being hurt.
I really hate social networking, don’t get me wrong. It’s pointless. The list of “friends” should really be changed to “acquaintances” “people I happen to know or may have met once at a party”
I think twitter has a little more potential though and I’m willing to give it a go. And in response to dustyBin, I always writing complete text messages with correct capitalization and grammar (it helps to have a Treo with spellcheck)
Oh and one more thing, Twitter is great for promoting joke sites that continually update. Like for example, last week I made http://HillaryClintonExplainsItAll.com and wrote a backend script that updates Twitter. Now people just have to subscribe to the feed to get all the latest fake Billary quotes.
Tim H
May 8th, 2008 at 5:14 pm
25I don’t twitter and my friends don’t twitter. I don’t give a crap what they are doing at every moment, and they don’t either.
Twitter is pointless and reminds me when people started getting mobile phones: they called people to just say hi and make pointless conversation: “I got a cellular phone!” Whoop-de-do. Once that ended (finally), the real purpose of mobile phones emerged.
The diufference between mobile phones and twitter is that twitter has no growth plan beyond the “look at me” phase. Pointless, stupid, insipid, and boring.
roddy
May 8th, 2008 at 11:07 pm
26I agree with pretty much everything. When I first found out what Twitter was all about I was in SHOCK. Here I am a bit worried that in this world of cellphones, instant messaging and social networking sites everyone is getting a bit _too_ connected… then I discover twitter. All that other stuff (cellphones, im, facebook etc) sort of ‘accidentally’ invade our privacy because they mainly have other uses, but the premise of Twitter is pretty much what I don’t like about cellphones and such. WHAT ARE YOU DOING NOW? How about ‘its none of your business’?
And I hate the goofy name too.
SEAN
May 15th, 2008 at 6:21 am
27ARE WE SO BORED TO DEATH THAT I WOULD START WANTING TO KNOW WHEN MY FRIEND EATS PEES AND SLEEPS!!! THIS IS THE END OF THE WORLD I GUESS
Ash
May 15th, 2008 at 6:25 am
28In a world of billion different minds you can always sell any lame product. No offense but I would rather spend my time on something less suckier. Funny how many of us googled for ‘twitter sucks’
Arzhan
May 15th, 2008 at 6:27 am
29Too entagled..too twitchy
Leave a reply